Archive for August, 2010

Less Is More

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Do you ever dream of one Australian football code that everyone follows?

I do. Will it ever happen? Maybe, maybe not. But it’s exciting to think of the benefits that would come from having fewer sports to follow in this country.

Put simply, fewer sporting codes would mean more money in the pot. Club memberships, broadcast dollars, merchandise sales, athlete wages, ticket sales and sponsorship would all skyrocket.

Everyone marvels at the amount of money sport attracts in America and Europe. And while we’ll never match those guys (due to population and economics) we can do better. But first we must cull a few sports.

Let’s take a look at the 15 highest paid NFL players in 2010:

1.    Peyton Manning, Colts $30.8 million total earnings (9th among US athletes, $15.8m salary/$15m endorsements)
2.    Matthew Stafford, Lions $27.6m (11, $26.9m/$0.7m)
3.    Eli Manning, Giants $26.5m (T13, $19.5m/$7m)
4.    Philip Rivers, Chargers $25.8m (17, $25.6m/$0.2m)
5.    Terrell Suggs, Ravens $24.9m (19, $24.9m/$0.0m)
6.    Albert Haynesworth, Redskins $24.6m (20, $24.6m/$0.1m)
7.    Brett Favre, Vikings $24m (21, $17m/$7m)
8.    Darrius Heyward-Bey, Raiders $21.5m (28, $21.4m/$0.0m)
9.    Jason Smith, Rams $20.6m (33, $20.5m/$0.0m)
10.    Julius Peppers, Bears $20m (36, $20m/$0.0m)
11.    Vince Wilfork, Patriots $18.9m (38, $18.9m/$0.0m)
12.    DeAngelo Hall, Redskins $18.5m (40, $18.5m/$0.0m)
13.    Tyson Jackson, Chiefs $18.1m (42, $18.1m/$0.0m)
14.    Mark Sanchez, Jets $16.9m (48, $16.4m/$0.5m)
15.    DeMarcus Ware, Cowboys $16.8m (49, $16m/$0.8m)

These wages are difficult to comprehend but take a closer look at the money pouring into the sport and you begin to understand why Peyton Manning has three cars……. two Escalades and one Cadillac SLR for the record.

According to AdAge, Anheuser-Busch recently signed a six-year, $1.2 billion agreement to reclaim its position as the league’s official beer sponsor. The deal takes effect in April of 2011.

Meanwhile, earlier this year, Verizon Wireless agreed to fork over $720 million over the next four years to replace Sprint as the NFL’s exclusive wireless partner.

And then there is PepsiCo who are in the final season of two deals totaling more than $1 billion: $560 million over six years for its Pepsi, Frito-Lay and Tropicana brands, and $500 million for Gatorade. And let’s not forget the league’s other 20 sponsors who pay anywhere between $10 – 15 million per year (and then outlay $1.5 billion collectively to leverage their sponsorships).

If that’s not enough money, then let’s include the NFL’s broadcast deals worth $3.7 billion per year (Monday Night Football is worth in excess of $1.1 billion alone) and you have a budget that slightly trumps the AFL, NRL, ARL and A-League put together. Oh, and we haven’t even discussed the individual NFL clubs and their sponsorship, membership and merchandising rights and their athletes who command individual endorsements on the side.

So if you’re an Australian footballer who couldn’t previously understand why the Redskins DeAngelo Hall is on $18.5m and you’re on $400,000 then maybe you can now?

Right now, we have a very fractured sporting landscape in Australia. Too many sports competing for a pie that isn’t that big.

Let’s do the maths. America has over 300 million people. And six big sports – NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, USPGA and NASCAR.

Australia has over 20 million people. A much smaller population, yet we have five big sports including the AFL, NRL, ARU, A-League and Cricket Australia.

It’s little wonder athletes are heading overseas for better pay, footy clubs are struggling to make a profit and memberships are not where they should be.

Based on the above equation, Australia should concentrate on having three big sports, minimum. The rest can battle for the scraps.

Now, the only problem is deciding on those three sports? Which three would you choose and why?

THICK SKINNED

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

It’s hard to ignore the slanging match going on between former Socceroo Robbie Slater and current Socceroo Harry Kewell.

Kewell has copped his fair share of media punishment over the years. And given the player’s frustration with Australia’s performance and his own subsequent non selection at the 2010 FIFA World Cup, I can understand him wanting to take on Slater.

But I would discourage athletes from going down the same path. Lashing out at journalists nearly always ends in tears. Here’s why:

1. Reacting (especially in public) only fuels the fire of a story you don’t want out there. Some fly away comments from Slater on PayTV are now backpage headlines because of Kewell’s response.

2. You’re only doing the journo a favour. Journalist’s love publicity because it raises their own profile and makes them more valuable within media circles.

3. Yes the media often get it wrong. But the public goes on the belief that where there is smoke, there is fire. Don’t let that smoke develop into fire (see point one).

4. Creating enemies in the media isn’t fun. They and the organisation they work for, will knock you at every opportunity. Who wants that?

Finally, if you fight a journalist on one front, where do you stop? Do you go on a personal vendetta against every journo that writes something bad about you? This is incredibly taxing and affects sporting performance.

It pays to have a thick skin, especially when it comes to the media.