Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

One in Six Billion

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

I’m going to tell you a great little story. It’s one that I love to share with people.

When I first started out in sports management, I was faced with a problem. The company I worked for managed an Olympic athlete that according to Australia Post, received more fan mail than Santa Claus did at Christmas time! Now don’t get me wrong, excess fan mail is a good problem to have. But disappointing thousands of fans because you can’t manage it, is not.

So there I was sitting in my office as a junior surrounded by finger paintings, drawings and letters from all over the world. I didn’t have the time nor the manpower to open them all let alone respond! Each letter represented a disappointed fan, well at least that’s how I viewed that mountain of mail.

Struggling for answers, I couldn’t help but think that this problem has been solved before by other sport stars and their management. Straight away I thought of my childhood hero Michael Jordan, surely he received lots of fan mail? What did he do? How did his management handle it? Gee, I would love to know the answers.

As crazy as it sounds, for the next couple of weeks I couldn’t help but replay that question over and over. How was Michael Jordan’s fan mail handled?

A few weeks later, I’m sifting through this Olympic athlete’s fan mail and the phone rings. It’s a mother in the USA wanting a poster of our Olympic athlete for her child. Great, I thought, another fan request, just what I need!

Reluctantly I had to explain my problem to her. “Thank you for your request but I can’t promise anything right now, I’m currently inundated with fan requests and I have limited resources,” I said.

She was extremely sympathetic to my situation (which was odd as most fans who want something aren’t) and I soon found out why. Her next line would leave me staring into space. “You know, I might be able to help you, I use to manage Michael Jordan’s fan mail,” she said.

Excuse me?

Turns out her husband previously worked at IMG, Michael’s management group. She and another woman (both wives of IMG executives) would go into the IMG office each week to help with Michael’s fan mail. I was completely shell-shocked. We ended up scheduling a conference call with both ladies and discussed the whole strategy which was heavily backed by Nike.

There are over six billion people in the world and the one person responsible for managing Michael Jordan’s fan mail picks up the phone and calls me!!

I don’t believe this was coincidence, I mean what are the odds? No, there had to be a better explanation. Was it the law of attraction? The Secret? Think and Grow Rich? Maybe.

The lesson here is to never underestimate the power of your mind, for what you think about ultimately drives what you get in life. Thoughts certainly drive your daily actions and maybe, just maybe the actions of those around you, even if they are half a world away.

Show Me the Money But Don’t Tell Me What To Do!

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Player agents don’t have the best reputation in the sports industry right now. From betting scandals to inappropriate dealings with a young girl, the spotlight is well and truly on player agents and their role in sport.

Ask most people in sport business what they think of agents and they’ll tell you that they are nothing but money hungry, over protective, egocentric, fast talking suits with a million dollar grin and dog eat dog mentality. While agents like that do exist, not everyone conforms to that stereotype. Every industry has its good guys and bad guys.

I’ll be the first to admit that most agents are brilliant at making money but lack the mentoring skills needed to guide an athlete off the field. That’s not to say there aren’t agents who can do both….. but they are a dime a dozen.

One columnist this week described agents as “yes men.” I’ve touched on this subject before. And to be honest it’s the single biggest reason for the lack of really great agents.

A yes man is someone who bows to the every command of an athlete. They say what the athlete wants to hear, not what they should hear. They sprout fantasies rather than the reality. They are exaggerate the truth and are rarely candid. A yes man doesn’t say no for fear of the consequences.

A lot of athletes grow up surrounded by yes men. When a young kid shows enormous talent, parents, coaches, friends and sporting bodies treat the prodigal talent very different to your average kid. Don’t want to upset the superstar. Often the kid gets away with things other kids wouldn’t. If you don’t believe me, read Andre Agassi’s autobiography and notice how he was treated at the Nick Bollettieri Tennis Academy compared to the other (less talented) kids.

This “special treatment” is hugely unfair on the young athlete. Much like a spoilt kid cracks it when they don’t get their own way, a young athlete might find it hard to accept criticism or be told what to do.

When a player agent comes into the life of a young athlete, it’s just another yes men being added to the entourage. Yes I can get you a free car. Yes I can get your image on the back of your favourite breakfast cereal. Yes I can get you into that party. And so on.

With each yes, it becomes harder to say no.

Most good agents either get burnt badly for saying no and conform to the yes men OR they walk away from the management game. And that’s why there are very few good agents. Personally I’ve been guilty of saying yes to athletes despite their ridiculous requests or expectations. I’ve also been extremely candid and experienced the awkwardness that comes with that.

Sports agents rely on a great talent to survive in a competitive industry. It’s their livelihood. So anything that threatens that livelihood (saying no and upsetting the athlete) is risky business. The athlete is more important to the manager than the other way around. The athlete knows this.

The problem is by trying to always appease the superstar, agents never enforce decisions that are in the best interests of the superstar. It super sucks but that’s the reality and why there a very few good agents.

Nike 6.0 Making Waves In the Surfing World

Thursday, January 6th, 2011

A game of musical chairs is playing out in the surfing world right now. Former Rip Curl pin up girl Stephanie Gilmore has signed with Quiksilver, while Nike 6.0 have snared the prized signature of fellow Aussie surfer Julian Wilson, a former Quiksilver client.

The Nike signing created the most interest though.

A couple of years ago, Nike 6.0 tried to sign South African surfing superstar Jordy Smith. They failed. And since then they have waited patiently for a big signing. They are only just starting to make inroads into the surfing world, but with a growing product line, cash to burn and a nous for selecting the right talent, Nike 6.0 will no doubt become a serious player in an industry that rewards good moves. And the signing of Julian Wilson is a good move.

You’ve got to admit, Nike entering surfing is a good thing. Here is a company that knows how to market and leverage sport. They have the experience, resources and money to progress the professionalism of surfing. They also know that having the right surfers wearing their stuff will dramatically close the gap on other established surf wear brands like Quiksilver, Rip Curl and Billabong. Nike also brings more money to the pot and that means more bargaining power to surfers and better pay.

Quiksilver, long considered the Nike of the surfing world, has successfully built a mega-brand over the years with the help of golden child Kelly Slater. Slater has done enormous things for the Quiksilver. It’s just another example of the power and influence brand ambassadors can have. And that’s why Nike 6.0 knows it can compete in this market.

Nike doesn’t have the rich history and great story that the other surf wear brands have. But it doesn’t need to. If the hottest young surfers are sporting Nike 6.0 stickers on their boards then the groms will soon follow.

How Online Newspapers Can Win

Monday, November 15th, 2010

The Australian featured an article today about the issue of paying for your print news online.

It’s a delicate discussion and one that I don’t have all the answers for. But I can at least provide some food for thought.

The big question newspapers want answered is: How do you get people to pay for something they already get for free?

The answer is, you can’t. That is unless you have exclusive content that none of your competitors have.

For years people watched TV for free and still do. But there was a day when the thought of paying for TV seemed ludicrous. Yet, cable television is now a global phenomena. Why? It has content no one else has and so people are happy to pay.

Can newspapers learn something from TV? Perhaps.

The question shouldn’t be “how do we get people to pay for our content?” Rather it should be “how do we make our content so exclusive that people have no choice but want to pay for it?”

Print is dying and re-emerging via apps on tablet computers. Therein lies a great opportunity to use amazing technology to enhance the readers experience.

Just like cable TV buys a hit show or sporting rights, online newspapers might think about buying great content. And content isn’t just words. It’s photos, video, games, social networking and other interactive entertainment.

I’m talking about unique B2B relationships that strengthen the appeal of an online newspaper. The kind of B2B relationships that give an online newspaper an advantage over news sites who only offer news.

Something to think about huh.

Life’s A Bitch

Monday, September 13th, 2010

I had the pleasure of hearing one of Australia’s great female athletes talk at a function last week. I won’t mention any names, but for a long time, she has been a fantastic ambassador for women’s sport.

When asked by an audience member, her thoughts on women’s sport not receiving the publicity the men get. Her reply took a few by surprise. It was blunt and controversial. But I thought it was a great insight and one I should share with you.

Her argument was that people follow sport because of the characters sport attracts. And great characters are not always great role models if you know what I mean. Just like any good movie, you need heroes and villains to create scandal and controversy. Unfortunately women’s sport doesn’t have this character X factor and that’s why it doesn’t get a lot of publicity.

There are a few other factors at play but you’ve got to admit, she makes a good point. Deep down most NRL and AFL fans love the product of footy just as much as the hoopla and entertainment that surrounds it. Just look at the attention the recent Ben Cousins documentary received.

People love scandal and drama, especially women, yet when it comes to sport it’s the women who steer away from the drama. Women’s sport is like the teacher’s pet in the classroom, an honorable student but also the most boring with no friends.

It’s not surprising the biggest grossing industries for women are music and film. These industries are full of characters. To stand out, you have to be! Publicity is a game so you’ve gotta play it.

Let’s look at the sports with the highest profile women. Tennis and swimming are two examples. Tennis has a long history of tantrums, bad behavior, controversial fashion and interesting personalities. And swimming has had its fair share of catfights, tears and twitter faux pas. These sports are full of good, bad and ugly stories. Which makes them interesting.

Fortunately for the girls, they have one of the biggest selling tools at their disposal. It’s called sex appeal. If you’ve got it, why not flaunt it? Like it or hate it, the Lingerie Football League has built a thriving business out of it. *I know more guys who watch this over other (female) sports. Sad but that’s reality.

Remember, this post was written after hearing the views of one of our country’s great female sport stars. Someone who has been at the coalface of their sport and understands the challenges of attracting media attention and hence dollars.

As a sports manager the last thing I would advise clients is to play up and misbehave. But I do believe there is room for some cheekiness, especially for women (and men) in sports that struggle for publicity and popularity.

Thunderstruck!

Friday, April 30th, 2010

What a mess. Of course I’m referring to the arguably the biggest Australian sporting controversy, ever.

The fact NRL club the Melbourne Storm elaborately and systematically cheated their way to four successive grand finals and two premierships over the past five years is disturbing.

But not as disturbing as the reaction from some quarters over the NRL’s punishment to strip the club of two premierships, three minor premierships and the opportunity to earn points this season.

Can we stop blaming the NRL?

For the credibility of the game, the NRL had no choice but to punish Melbourne the way they did. And remember, this was a decision that had the support of Melbourne and NRL stakeholder News Limited. It’s also a decision that has the support of 90% of NRL fans.

Personally I think the club got off lightly. The team shouldn’t be allowed on the park this season. But to give the club the best chance at survival, the NRL has allowed them to play on.

NRL CEO David Gallop should be commended for showing strong leadership and decision making in the face of criticism from media personalities who don’t understand the first thing about business.

As crucial as the Melbourne market is for Rugby League, no one club or player is bigger than the game. For the game to win the respect of fans and other clubs who bust their guts to play fairly, Melbourne had to cop their punishment on the chin.

My final word on this saga:

Everyone agrees that Winning in sport = Success off the field.

So for every club to be successful they need to be winning, right?

So to give every team the best chance at winning, the talent needs to be spread out so the competition is even, am I correct?

This is why a salary cap exists. It’s the best formula right now to grow the game.

Yes Melbourne deserve a chance to succeed but so does every other club. The NRL understands this. News Limited understand this. The majority of fans understand this.

Unfortunately those people that think they know the right solution, don’t. Because any other solution would only divide the fans even more.

Congratulations to the NRL for having courage under fire.

Licensing…It’s Got To Be-e-e-e Perfect!

Friday, April 9th, 2010

Established brands should be wary when it comes to licensing deals leveraging the name of a celebrity.

I’m talking about brands that name products after celebrities. This strategy often fails because the idea is un-believable. Not everything a celebrity touches turns to gold.

There are a few exceptions to the rule. Classic examples include the “George Foreman Grill” or “Nike Air Jordan” basketball shoes.

The George Foreman Grill worked because George Foreman endorsing a grill is believable. The public knew George didn’t invent the grill but he represented the grill’s perfect customer. A big guy with a big appetite who loves his meat but doesn’t like complicated cooking.

Nike Air Jordan worked because the “shoe” was part of Jordan’s performance equipment. It was believable Jordan had input into the design and features. So it was ok to name the shoe after him.

On the other hand, we have a product like “Tiger” Gatorade. This failed because Gatorade was already an established brand – it didn’t need to hi-jack a celebrity’s name. I was always more inclined to buy Gatorade because it’s Tiger’s choice of drink. Not because it was named after him. There is a big difference.

Look at Emporio Armani underwear and its ambassor David Beckham. The brand could choose to bring out “David Beckham” underwear under the Emporio Armani label, but they don’t because they know it wouldn’t work. Why? Because people buy Emporio Armani because the brand is an expert at making great underwear. David Beckham is an expert a playing football. Where’s the connection? Naming a range after Becks would only cheapen the product and ridicule the intelligence of Armani customers.

Licensing is done best when both the celebrity and product are a perfect fit for each other. Anything less than perfect just doesn’t work.

PS. Was anyone really surprised by Tiger Woods’ shooting 68 on the opening day of the Masters tournament? I wasn’t. This is the first time Tiger has ever entered a tournament without the expectations of winning it. Given his preparation, it was ok if he didn’t perform. What a huge weight off his shoulders! He has nothing to lose. And that makes him very very dangerous.

Spinning Your Own Web

Monday, March 29th, 2010

What an eventful weekend for the Australian Grand Prix.

It started on Friday night when pin up boy Lewis Hamilton had his sponsor car impounded by police for hoon driving.

And it finished yesterday with Australian Mark Webber criticising Melbourne’s tough anti-hoon laws, labelling Victoria a “nanny state.”

Let’s start with Hamilton. What he did was dumb. No doubt about it. But to his credit, he handled the fallout smoothly, showing great remorse for his actions by apologising and assisting police.

The authorities won’t like this but Lewis Hamilton fans got a kick out of the stunt and it may have even won the McLaren driver some new fans. A kinda  cool story to tell the grandkids one day.

Hamilton walks away embarrassed but not disgraced and certainly not with a target on his back.

Unfortunately I can’t say the same about a very own F1 star Mark Webber. Unlike Hamilton, Webber didn’t get caught hooning and he didn’t have his car impounded by police. Webber’s only lowpoint of the weekend was his result in the big race, a disappointing ninth.

So why then does Webber fly out of Melbourne under fire from angry authorities and a divided public? Cue his comments about Victoria’s road laws.

I’m not going to debate Victoria’s road laws. What I am going to debate is the need to speak out about the road laws. Maybe Webber wanted to take the focus off his disappointing result? Or maybe by defending Hamilton, Webber saw a chance to score some points with the McLaren driver who he crashed into? Or maybe Webber is just incredibly passionate about Victoria’s road laws?

Whatever the reason for Webber’s comments it sure has created some heated debate. Authorities agree that if everyone was as skilled behind a wheel as an F1 driver then maybe they could relax the current road laws. But unfortunately not everyone is an F1 driver as witnessed by Victoria’s road toll of 78 this year.

I’ve got to question Webber’s comments for one reason and that is, apart from dividing people, exactly what are the comments going to achieve?

It’s fair to say Lewis Hamilton feels the same way about Victoria’s road laws but unlike Webber, Hamilton is smart enough to stay out of the debate.

I really feel for Webber, he has enough targets on his back (especially with the Australian media who don’t understand the politics of his sport) without giving them extra ammunition.

It’s true that Webber’s core motorhead fans welcome these comments. Just like Hamilton, Webber probably even won some new fans for speaking out about the road laws. But at what cost?

Webber jets out this week, unable to stick around and doing anything positive to change the road laws. So again I’ve gotta ask, what does this all achieve?

I often begrudge the negative press Australian athletes receive by their own countryman but sometimes its hard to defend. Let’s hope Webber can focus on the season ahead, I’ll still be cheering him on the track.

The Fine Line

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

The Australian public are a fickle bunch. We want our sport stars to walk a tightrope. And if they step off the line, boy are we disappointed.

If a representative of the Australian public sat down with an athlete, they would give the athlete this advice:

  • Be the best BUT don’t tell everyone you’re the best
  • Stand up for yourself BUT don’t be a bully
  • Have a wholesome image BUT don’t forget to have a personality
  • Be confident BUT don’t be arrogant
  • Take risks BUT don’t make mistakes
  • Be a team player BUT stand out
  • Be charitable BUT make it a charity I’m interested in
  • Be available to the media BUT don’t overexpose yourself
  • Speak well in interviews BUT don’t be a robot
  • Have an interesting life story BUT don’t bring out the skeletons in your closet
  • Attract advertisers and bring money into your sport BUT don’t sell my kids sugary foods
  • Push yourself & train hard BUT don’t get injured

I could go on but I think you get the point.

The athletes that can follow this impossible advice are the ones rewarded with the popularity and sponsorship. Think Pat Rafter or Ian Thorpe for example.

The problem is most sportspeople can’t walk this fine line because it’s just too bloody hard.

C’mon Australia, let’s be less judgemental about our heroes.

It would be very boring if every athlete went by the rulebook when it came to conduct on and off the field. We want variety and a few characters. Heroes and villains. That’s one reason I love sport so much. It’s real. And in the real world, the people are real. Cut them a little slack.

Coming Out of the Woods

Friday, February 19th, 2010

The sporting media is at the ready for the Tiger Woods press conference tomorrow.

Tiger will obviously have a prepared statement, although I do hope he speaks from the heart and not a sheet of paper. The public will appreciate an honest and genuine Woods as opposed to a commercially sensitive scripted robot Woods.

Honestly, I really expect Tiger to present himself well and win back some fans or at least start the healing process.

Some PR experts are slamming Tiger’s management group for not allowing questions, but if you think about it, a Q&A would create a circus. Tiger has a message he wants to get out and the best way to control that message is to stop at questions.

The only messages you will read in the newspapers the next day are Tiger’s statements about his remorse and his comeback to golf as opposed to what club Elin was hitting his car with.

From Tiger’s point of view, the whole world now knows his story. He regards the complexities of this story to be private / part of his personal life. The only thing left to do is apologise, rebuild and move on.

As a fan of Tiger, I’m not interested in the gritty details of his scandal, I’m interested in what he’s doing to make amends, to be a better person. I want him to hold himself accountable, acknowledge he let down a lot of people including the sponsors who supported him. And I want to see genuine humility and an effort through action to rebuild the trust with the public.

That’s just me. The media on the other hand, they have a million questions they want answers for. Time will tell if they get those answers.